The WOT perfectly explained

I just received the following "essay" from a friend. The friend's comments precede those of the author of the "essay". I concur completely with my friend's comments regarding the cogency and urgency of these remarks, which speak forcefully and to my mind accurately about the threat this country and the West faces from the Muslims who want us all dead. Everyone should read and think about the thoughts expressed here because our fate and the future of our children and grandchildren are at stake. As regards the political fallout from this threat, I am now leaning toward supporting Rudy Gulliani for POTUS (after contributing cash to Mitt Romney's campaign), because I think Gulliani's experiences as Mayor of NYC during and after 9/11 may very well best qualify him to recognize the seriousness of our predictament and help provide the moral clarity to do what is necessary to defeat the Muslims and neutralize their idiot sympathizers wherever they are.

> This is the most cogent and powerful essay on the
> threat of Islamic terrorism I have seen. Dr.
> Vernon Chong is without a doubt the most articulate
> and convincing writing I have read regarding the War
> in Iraq . If you have any doubts please open your
> mind to his essay and give it a fair evaluation.
> It's also eerily applicable to other current issues
> such as Iran 's nuclear program, immigration,
> NAFTA's impact on American jobs, trade deficits,
> etc.. I had no idea who Dr. Chong is, or the
> source of these thoughts, so when I received them I
> almost deleted them, as well- written as they are.
> But then I did a Google search on the Doctor and
> found him to be a retired Air Force surgeon and past
> commander of Wilford Hall Medical Center in San
> Antonio .
>
> If you would like to see who this fellow is, go to
> this Air Force web site and look him up:
> http://www.af.mil/bios/bio.asp?bioID=5000
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Subject: Muslims, terrorist and the USA : A
> different spin on Iraq war:
>
> This WAR is for REAL!
>
> Dr. Vernon Chong, Major General, USAF, Retired
>
> To get out of a difficulty, one usually must go
> through it. Our country is now facing the most
> serious threat to its existence, as we know it, that
> we have faced in your lifetime and mine (which
> includes WWII).
>
> The deadly seriousness is greatly compounded by
> the fact that there are very few of us who think we
> can possibly lose this war and even fewer who
> realize what losing really means.
>
> First, let's examine a few basics:
>
> 1. When did the threat to us start?
>
> Many will say September 11, 2001. The answer as
> far as the United States is concerned is 1979, 22
> years prior to September 2001, with the following
> attacks on us:
>
> * Iran Embassy Hostages, 1979;
> * Beirut , Lebanon Embassy 1983;
> * Beirut , Lebanon Marine Barracks 1983;
> * Lockerbie , Scotland Pan-Am flight to New York
> 1988;
> * First New York World Trade Center attack 1993;
> * Dhahran , Saudi Arabia Khobar Towers Military
> complex 1996;
> * Nairobi , Kenya US Embassy 1998;
> * Dares Salaam , Tanzania US Embassy 1998;
> * A! den, Yemen USS Cole 2000;
> * New York World Trade Center 2001;* Pentagon
> 2001.
>
> (Note that during the period from 1981 to 2001
> there were 7,581 terrorist attacks worldwide).
>
> 2. Why were we attacked?
>
> Envy of our position, our success, and our
> freedoms. The attacks happened during the
> administrations of Presidents Carter, Reagan, Bush
> 1, Clinton and Bush 2. We cannot fault either the
> Republicans or Democrats as there were no
> provocations by any of the presidents or their
> immediate predecessor, President Ford.
>
> 3. Who were the attackers?
>
> In each case, the attacks on the US were carried
> out by Muslims!
>
> 4. What is the Muslim population of the World?
>
> 25%.
>
> 5. Isn't the Muslim Religion peaceful?
>
> Hopefully, but that is really not material. There
> is no doubt that the predominately Christian
> population of Germany was peaceful, but under the
> dictatorial leadership of Hitler (who was also
> Christian, ?), that made no difference. You either
> went along with the administration or you were
> eliminated. There were 5 to 6 million Christians
> killed by the Nazis for political reasons (including
>
> 7,000 Polish priests).
>
> (see http://www.Nazis.testimony.co.uk/7-a.htm
>
> Thus, almost the same number of Christians were
> killed by the Nazis, as the six million holocaust
> Jews who were killed by them, and we seldom heard of
> anything other than the Jewish atrocities. Although
> Hitler kept the world focused on the Jews, he had no
> hesitancy about killing anyone who got in his way of
> exterminating the Jews or of taking over the world -
> German, Christian or any others.
>
> Same with the Muslim terrorists. They focus the
> world on the US , but kill all in the way -- their
> own people or the Spanish, British, French or anyone
> else. The point here is that just like the peaceful
> Germans were of no protection to anyone from the
> Nazis, no matter how many peaceful Muslims there may
> be, they are no protection for us from the terrorist
> Muslim leaders and what they are fanatically bent on
> doing -- by their own pronouncements
> -- killing all of us "infidels." I don't blame the
> peaceful Muslims. What would you do if the choice
> was shut up or die?
>
> 6. So who are we at war with?
>
> There is no way we can honestly respond that it is
> anyone other than the Muslim terrorists. Trying to
> be politically correct and avoid verbalizing this
> conclusion can well be fatal. There is no way to
> win if you don't clearly recognize and articulate
> who you are fighting.
>
> So with that background, now to the two major
> questions:
>
> 1. Can we lose this war?
>
> 2. What does losing really mean?
>
> If we are to win, we must clearly answer these two
> pivotal questions:
>
> We can definitely lose this war, and as anomalous
> as it may sound, the major reason we can lose is
> that so many of us simply do not fathom the answer
> to the second question - What does losing mean?
>
> It would appear that a great many of us think that
> losing the war means hanging our heads, bringing the
> troops home and going on about our business, like
> post-Vietnam. This is as far from the truth as one
> can get.
>
> What losing really means is:
>
> We would no longer be the premier country in the
> world. The attacks will not subside, but rather
> will steadily increase. Remember, they want us
> dead, not just quiet. If they had just wanted us
> quiet, they would not have produced an increasing
> series of attacks against us, over the past 18
> years. The plan was, clearly, for terrorists to
> attack us until we were neutered and submissive to
> them.
>
> We would, of course, have no future support from
> other nations, for fear of reprisals and for the
> reason that they would see; we are impotent and
> cannot help them.
>
> They will pick off the other non-Muslim nations,
> one at a time. It will be increasingly easier for
> them. They already hold Spain hostage. It doesn't
> matter whether it was right or wrong for Spain to
> withdraw its troops from Iraq . Spain did it
> because the Muslim terrorists bombed their train and
> told them to withdraw the troops. Anything else
> they want Spain to do will be done. Spain is
> finished.
>
> The next will probably be France . Our one hope
> on France is that they might see the light and
> realize that if we don't win, they are finished too,
> in that they can't resist the Muslim terrorists
> without us. However, it may already be too late for
> France . France is already 20% Muslim and fading
> fast!
>
> Without our support Great Britain will go too.
> Recently I read that there are more mosques in
> England than churches.
>
> If we lose the war, our production, income,
> exports and way of life will all vanish as we know
> it. After losing, who would trade or deal with us
> if they were threatened by the Muslims. If we can't
> stop the Muslim terrorists, how could anyone else?
>
> The radical Muslims fully know what is riding on
> this war, and therefore are completely committed to
> winning, at any cost. We better know it too and be
> likewise committed to winning at any cost.
>
> Why do I go on at such lengths about the results
> of losing? Simple. Until we recognize the costs of
> losing, we cannot unite and really put 100% of our
> thoughts and efforts into winning. And it is going
> to take that 100% effort to win.
>
> So, how can we lose the war?
>
> Again, the answer is simple. We can lose the war
> by "imploding." That is, defeating ourselves by
> refusing to recognize the enemy and their purpose,
> and really digging in and lending full support to
> the war effort. If we are united, there is no way
> that we can lose. If we continue to be divided,
> there is no way that we can win!
>
> Let me give you a few examples of how we simply
> don't comprehend the life and death seriousness of
> this situation.
>
> President Bush selects Norman Mineta as Secretary
> of Transportation. Although all of the terrorist
> attacks were committed by Muslim men between 17 and
> 40 years of age, Secretary Mineta refuses to allow
> profiling. Does that sound like we are taking this
> thing seriously? This is war! For the duration, we
> are going to have to give up some of the civil
> rights to which we have become accustomed. We had
> better be prepared to lose some of our civil rights
> temporarily or we will most certainly lose all of
> them permanently.
>
> And don't worry that it is a slippery slope. We
> gave up plenty of civil rights during WWII, and
> immediately restored them after the victory and in
> fact added many more since then.
>
> Do I blame President Bush or President Clinton
> before him?
>
> No, I blame us for blithely assuming we can
> maintain all of our Political Correctness, and all
> of our civil rights during this conflict and have a
> clean, lawful, honorable war. None of those words
> apply to war. Get them out of your head.
>
> Some have gone so far in their criticism of the
> war and/or the Administration that it almost seems
> they would literally like to see us lose.
>
> I think some actually do, I hasten to add that
> this isn't because they are disloyal. It is because
> they just don't recognize what losing means.
> Nevertheless, that conduct gives the impression to
> the enemy that we are divided and weakening. It
> concerns our friends, and it does great damage to
> our cause.
>
> Of more recent vintage, the uproar fueled by the
> politicians and media regarding the treatment of
> some prisoners of war, perhaps exemplifies best what
> I am saying. We have recently had an issue,
> involving the treatment of a few Muslim prisoners of
> war, by a small group of our military police. These
> are the type prisoners who just a few months ago
> were throwing their own people off buildings,
> cutting off their hands, cutting out their tongues
> and otherwise murdering their own people just for
> disagreeing with Saddam Hussein!
>
> And just a few years ago these same type prisoners
> chemically killed 400,000 of their own people for
> the same reason. They are also the same type of
> enemy fighters, who recently were burning Americans,
> and dragging their charred corpses through the
> streets of Iraq . And still more recently, the same
> type of enemy that was and is providing videos to
> all news sources internationally, of the beheading
> of American prisoners they held.
>
> Compare this with some of our press and
> politicians, who for several days have thought and
> talked about nothing else but the "humiliating" of
> some Muslim prisoners -- not burning them, not
> dragging their charred corpses through the streets,
> not beheading them, but "humiliating" them.
>
> Can they be for real?
>
> The politicians and pundits have even talked of
> impeachment of the Secretary of Defense. If this
> doesn't show the complete lack of comprehension and
> understanding of the seriousness of the enemy we are
> fighting, the life and death struggle we are in and
> the disastrous results of losing this war, nothing
> can.
>
> To bring our country to a virtual political
> standstill over this prisoner issue makes us look
> like Nero playing his fiddle as Rome burned --
> totally oblivious to what is going on in the real
> world. Neither we, nor any other country, can
> survive this internal strife. Again I say, this
> does not mean that some of our politicians or media
> people are disloyal. It simply means that they are
> absolutely oblivious to the magnitude of the
> situation we are in and into which the Muslim
> terrorists have been pushing us, for many years.
>
> These people are a serious and dangerous liability
> to the war effort. We must take note of who they
> are and get them out of office. Remember, the
> Muslim terrorists stated goal is to kill all
> infidels! That translates into ALL non-Muslims --
> not just in the United States , but throughout the
> world. We are the last bastion of defense.
>
> We have been criticized for many years as being
> 'arrogant.' That charge is valid. We are arrogant
> in that we believe that we are so good, powerful and
> smart, that we can win the hearts and minds of all
> those who attack us, and that with both hands tied
> behind our back, we can defeat anything bad in the
> world! We can't!
>
> If we don't recognize this, our nation as we know
> it will not survive, and no other free country in
> the world will survive if we are defeated.
>
> And finally, name any Muslim countries throughout
> the world that allow freedom of speech, freedom of
> thought, freedom of religion, freedom of the press,
> equal rights for anyone -- let alone everyone, equal
> status or any status for women, or that have been
> productive in one single way that contributes to the
> good of the world.
>
> This has been a long way of saying that we must be
> united on this war or we will be equated in the
> history books to the self- inflicted fall of the
> Roman Empire . If, that is, the Muslim leaders will
> allow history books to be written or read.
>
> If we don't win this war right now, keep a close
> eye on how the Muslims take over France in the next
> 5 years or less. They will continue to increase the
> Muslim population of France and continue to encroach
> little by little, on the established French
> traditions.
>
> The French will be fighting among themselves, over
> what should or should not be done, which will
> continue to weaken them and keep them from any
> united resolve. Doesn't that sound eerily familiar?
>
> Democracies don't have their freedoms taken away
> from them by some external military force. Instead,
> they give their freedoms away, politically correct
> piece by politically correct piece.
>
> And they are giving those freedoms away to those
> who have shown, worldwide that they abhor freedom
> and will not apply it to you or even to themselves,
> once they are in power.
>
> Muslims have universally shown that when they have
> taken over, they then start brutally killing each
> other over whom will be the few who control the
> masses.
>
> What is happening in Iraq is a good example. Will
> we ever stop hearing from the politically correct,
> about the "peaceful Muslims".
>
> I close on a hopeful note, by repeating what I
> said above. If we are united, there is no way that
> we can lose. I hope now, after the election, the
> factions in our country will begin to focus on the
> critical situation we are in, and will unite to save
> our country. It is your future we are talking
> about! Do whatever you can to preserve it. I
> reiterate. A national election is months away.
>
> After reading the above, we all must do this not
> only for ourselves, but our children, our
> grandchildren, our country and the world. Whether
> Democrat or Republican, conservative or liberal and
> that includes the Politicians and media of our
> country and the free world!
>
> Please forward this to any you feel may want, or
> NEED to read it. Our "leaders" in Congress ought to
> read it, too. There are those that find fault with
> our country, but it is obvious to anyone who truly
> thinks through this, that we must UNITE!
>
> Lastly, I wish to add: At the risk of offending
> someone, I sincerely think that anyone who rejects
> this as just another political rant, or doubts the
> seriousness of this issue or just deletes it without
> sending it on, is part of the problem. Let's quit
> laughing at and forwarding the jokes and cartoons
> which denigrate and ridicule our leaders in this war
> against terror. They are trying to protect the
> interests and well being of the US and it's
> citizens. Best we support them.
>
> GOD BLESS AMERICA!
>